Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science

Original article

Efficacy of ramosetron in combination with polyethylene glycol of preparing for a colonoscopy: Min Kyu Kang, Byung Ik Jang, Jun Suk Park, Kyeong Ok Kim; Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2019;36(2):99-104. Published online December 28, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2019.00080

4,953 View
94 Download
1 Crossref

Background
Because of its efficacy and safety, polyethylene glycol (PEG) is generally used to prepare for colonoscopy. However, the side effects of PEG, including nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, pain, and general weakness, tend to decrease patient compliance and satisfaction. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of PEG with 0.1 mg ramosetron on colonoscopy patients who had difficulty taking PEG due to side effects or large volume.
Methods
From January to August in 2012, 28 patients who visited Yeungnam University hospital for a colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled. All enrolled patients were previous history underwent colonoscopy using PEG only in our hospital. The efficacy and safety of ramosetron were assessed through the use of a questionnaire, and compared previous bowel preparation.
Results
Compared to previous examination, the patients using the ramosetron reported less nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, and abdominal pain, as well as a higher degree of compliance and satisfaction of the patient. There were no side effects reported with the use of ramosetron. However, overall bowel preparation quality was not better than the previous examination.
Conclusion
In case of the use of ramosetron in combination with PEG for bowel preparation, patients experienced a higher rate of compliance and tolerance. Looking forward, ramosetron may become an option of pretreatment for bowel preparation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Tolerance to colonoscopy preparation with Fortrans and predictors of negative effects
I. A. Matveev, B. K. Gibert, A. I. Matveev, M. P. Kozlov
Bulletin of Siberian Medicine.2021; 20(1): 83. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search